I'll try and explain this a little bit. The terms molecular weight or gram formula weight are used in regards to Avogadro's formula. I'll bypass this part of the chemistry lesson to make things easier
Let's say I was able to hold 100 molecules of testosterone and I could weigh it. It's weight is 288.4 grams. This is the molecular weight of testosterone or the gram formula weight. Now take a short chain like prop, the molecular weight is 344.5 grams. Let's convert the percentage of test that is actually in test prop. The molecular weight of test is is 288.4 x 100 divided the molecular weight of test prop, 344.5. The result is 83.7% test in test prop.
Cyp for example. The molecular weight of cyp is 412 grams so we have 288x100 divided by 412= 70%
So prop has 83.7% test an cyp has 70%
DVD Is going to argue that the half life of test 400 is in fact not 200 ( I'll use cyp an example because the maths are easier ) but 140 which is correct but start the fucking argument with the ester cleaved off in the first place, so it's not 400mg of cyp it is actually 280
Fin
School's out suckers
Let's say I was able to hold 100 molecules of testosterone and I could weigh it. It's weight is 288.4 grams. This is the molecular weight of testosterone or the gram formula weight. Now take a short chain like prop, the molecular weight is 344.5 grams. Let's convert the percentage of test that is actually in test prop. The molecular weight of test is is 288.4 x 100 divided the molecular weight of test prop, 344.5. The result is 83.7% test in test prop.
Cyp for example. The molecular weight of cyp is 412 grams so we have 288x100 divided by 412= 70%
So prop has 83.7% test an cyp has 70%
DVD Is going to argue that the half life of test 400 is in fact not 200 ( I'll use cyp an example because the maths are easier ) but 140 which is correct but start the fucking argument with the ester cleaved off in the first place, so it's not 400mg of cyp it is actually 280
Fin
School's out suckers