• TMuscle acknowledges the use of AAS (anabolic and androgenic steroids) POMs (prescription-only medicines) and other performance-enhancing substances in bodybuilding today. It aims to provide reliable information on their safe administration, side effects and dangers.

    TMuscle does not approve or support the unlawful supply, possession or use of any drug.

    Members may report and describe factually their experiences with AAS and brands of AAS and POMs.

    Members may not offer to supply or facilitate the unlawful supply of AAS, POMS or other controlled drugs on TMuscle or its messaging systems.

Peptides - real results?

R

Rodent

Full Member
I seen a lot of Internet stuff on peps with different results.some say good some say not good.

Two trainers in my gym say about using GHRP -2 and GHRP-6 together and not with the cjc1295
as most internets say say works best.

They say the mix of the 2 and 4 give good fat loss and both are lean and on nothing but Test and the peps . They say they saw the difference starting the peps.

Goes against the stuff written on the Internet but they say works.

What do people hear think?
 
peps are good for what they do but its not what most state or imagine ime... brilliant for healing, help lean a little, not so much for mass...
 
Gifford chilford said:
Im on 2x100mcg of imaporelin per day, have been for a month, noticed nothing
Click to expand...
Could be down to quality? Twice a day is a tad bit low, try 3-4 times. CJC will help.

Also as well, you're not going to notice drastic results. Main thing I notice is water retention, especially around my ankles and calves.
 
AaronHudson said:
Could be down to quality? Twice a day is a tad bit low, try 3-4 times. CJC will help.

Also as well, you're not going to notice drastic results. Main thing I notice is water retention, especially around my ankles and calves.
Click to expand...
I've always noticed a lot of water gains n not much else lol
 
Rodent said:
I seen a lot of Internet stuff on peps with different results.some say good some say not good.

Two trainers in my gym say about using GHRP -2 and GHRP-6 together and not with the cjc1295
as most internets say say works best.

They say the mix of the 2 and 4 give good fat loss and both are lean and on nothing but Test and the peps . They say they saw the difference starting the peps.

Goes against the stuff written on the Internet but they say works.

What do people hear think?
Click to expand...
taking 2 GHRP peptides is fine but they are getting half the results without a GHRH peptide, to be fair its pretty stupid as they will get better results by dropping GHRP-6 and adding a GHRH like Mod GRF...

so they are not wrong they do work but they are certainly wrong in the fact what they are doing works best.......and whilst i do agree you can stay lean on peptides they cannot say with accuracy that it is the peptides that is making them lean as the Prop will be contributing to that as well.

Con said:
Erm....add a ghrp in with it dude!
Click to expand...
i think you mean a GHRH mate as IPAM is a GHRP buddy

many compare peptides with GH and are disappointed yet they use a much larger dose of GH so it is not a fair comparison......the other thing that gets me is when guys choose to use cheap peptides and expect great things....

clinical grade peptides at 3 - 5 x day at saturation dose with a GHRP/GHRH combo will give noticeable fat loss given time but as with most things people want results by the end of the 2nd day or they are crap lol
 
Pscarb said:
taking 2 GHRP peptides is fine but they are getting half the results without a GHRH peptide, to be fair its pretty stupid as they will get better results by dropping GHRP-6 and adding a GHRH like Mod GRF...

so they are not wrong they do work but they are certainly wrong in the fact what they are doing works best.......and whilst i do agree you can stay lean on peptides they cannot say with accuracy that it is the peptides that is making them lean as the Prop will be contributing to that as well.

i think you mean a GHRH mate as IPAM is a GHRP buddy

many compare peptides with GH and are disappointed yet they use a much larger dose of GH so it is not a fair comparison......the other thing that gets me is when guys choose to use cheap peptides and expect great things....

clinical grade peptides at 3 - 5 x day at saturation dose with a GHRP/GHRH combo will give noticeable fat loss given time but as with most things people want results by the end of the 2nd day or they are crap lol
Click to expand...
I used to know all this shit.....oh well.

Yes add the ghrh with it my bad....i knew some thing was missing at least *rolls eyes*

*crawls back to the natty section*
 
can't say i felt a justifiable benefit using ghrp with cjc. not enough to justify the price as cmc is twice the cost in terms of duration.

GHRP alone i fell is fantastic and critical to an off season cycle for me and people like me…not so useful to more endo-fatty prone people.
 
Rab said:
can't say i felt a justifiable benefit using ghrp with cjc. not enough to justify the price as cmc is twice the cost in terms of duration.

GHRP alone i fell is fantastic and critical to an off season cycle for me and people like me…not so useful to more endo-fatty prone people.
Click to expand...
in my opinion no one should buy CJC of any type, as they should not exist anymore as the CJC acronym was for a company that adjusted the lifespan of the GHRH (1295, 1293 etc) that company does not exist anymore and have not for a long time, what sites should be selling is Modified GRF 1-29 and that is what people should be buying to be honest.

when you look at the action CJC1295 wo DAC is similar to Modified GRF but it is not as effective.....

i challenged a site once as they where advertising CJC1293 as Mod GRF yet the life span of the 1293 is approx 5min so not long enough o survive to create an adequate pulse or amplification.....

sorry rant over :) was not meant for you Rab its just a pet peeve of mine lol

if you use decent peptides combining a GHRP and GHRH will give better results than either alone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top