Proteinbrah
Top Contributor
I’m awaiting ggte’s 94 page study that shows how I’m wrong thoughExactly. Just cba arguing with the numptys on there.
I’m awaiting ggte’s 94 page study that shows how I’m wrong thoughExactly. Just cba arguing with the numptys on there.
Why’s that then? Genuinely would like to know how the same blood in my body shows different results because of the way it’s taken out
Most of the blood tests I’ve had from medichecks have been finger prick, and I’ve never noticed anything unusual...
Or is this like a ukm conspiracy, where the lab pushers blame the ukas accredited laboratory, rather than the ugl
I’m awaiting ggte’s 94 page study that shows how I’m wrong though
Relax man, I’m just pulling your plumbsI mean, I can just stop if it irks you that much?
Relax man, I’m just pulling your plumbs
I asked for an explanation, you gave one
When you say they over report prolactin and under report test e2, on what are you basing that on?
First link is about hct, not hormones, your second link didn’t work for me mate
No it doesn't dry out. You drop about a mls worth of blood into a vial with a preservative in the same way. You've just drawn from a vein.Ano in simple terms when I check my blood sugars in the house you prick your finger then dab it on a strip and straight into the machine , where as with the test yesterday it was with a syringe then connect to a test tube let it fill with blood then disconnect ,the tube has a preservative in the bottom you need to turn the tube upside down 10x to let it mix to stop the blood going off on the way to the lab, so a take it if you do a finger test in the post it's dried blood ?
They’ll always be slight variation between tests even if they were took minutes apart no?Its the same principle, they use the same sampling method for everything on the testing. Pick a hormone plus blood spot test or something like that, the study will list the issues with present accuracy and the inconsistencies between sites. The tests also carry a +/-15% variance that they try to meet, it can often be missed by human error handling the blot paper and the end user not providing enough blood in the spot etc.
I only get bloods pulled on test only. As soon as you have anything else added you need sensitive testing done and its double the costs which i can't afford to do everytime.
The finger prick tests will be the biggest earner for them. Cheapest to produce, handle and test. They're however the most innacurate using current tech.
Try one test just as you are no prep, right hand, clip and drip a bit blood. Get another test, have a bath, index finger left hand, get a good deep bleed into the test. Send both away and see what the difference is in the results minutes apart
Definitely mate, they don’t knock the finger test if the results come back sound though do theyI think ukm have started the whole finger prick tests are worthless rumours, based on fact certain labs didn't do so well in hormone levels. However knowing the greater picture and the motives behind, of course you're going to post unfavourable blood tests (probably screwed) if you're a reseller for a diff lab.
They’ll always be slight variation between tests even if they were took minutes apart no?
The way to go would be draw from vein and finger then send off, if it’s massively different then it would prove your point I guess
If it’s just slight variation then I don’t think it’s anything to worry about is it
You get lh pulses every 20 mins or so iirc