An area i'm interested in but my opinion is split really.
I am less bothered than most about possessions and find happiness mainly in non material things. I try not to get bogged down in negativity (dont use any social media except this site and try to stay clear of other external sources of negativity- people, things on tv etc) and try to look for the silver lining in things where i can.
On the flip side i cant stand the whole 'i'm awake, you're not' pity type of attitude that seems prevalent. It's very much on par with the condescending attitude of some of the more religious people. Just to add not seen any of that attitude in this thread but plenty of it if look at some philosophy forums etc.
I think it can also take away peoples drive/motivation in life. Eg when you get to the point that money and personal possessions are not the path to happiness then what need is there to work, or improve your standard of living by working a bit harder? Take a look at the fisherman story- it's a bit of a false perception (if taken literally although i do actually agree with the moral behind it), the fisherman doesnt need to make more money because he's happy already. He has a little house or hut or whatever on the beach, the weather is lovely, the days are relaxed, and very much stress free other than providing food for his family which seems an easy task.
I know it's not meant literally but even taking the moral of being happy rather than focusing on other peoples perceptions of if youve succeeded or if you have a bigger car than the jonesies etc- is it possible to do this without striving for a half decent income which may involve stress and less free time to pursue the things you enjoy doing?
If work, money, and other peoples perceptions of your success are irrelevant then what's to stop you quitting working, living off the state and spending your time pursuing happiness? (which should be possible in theory as not striving for material things).
If you do the above and go down this route then obviously you are going to be in the lower percentile of income and by default (generally) live in areas with a higher crime rate and poorer standards of schooling if have kids. Can you be happy if youre worried about getting robbed, property damaged or being jumped whenever you walk down your street?
If you have kids would you not worry about setting them up for a better life with a better education by living in a better area with better schools? Or is this irrelevant and just an example of the trap the people 'sleeping through life' fall into? But if you would like to improve the area you live then surely you need to suck it up and perhaps have to sacrifice certain things?
The above is just thinking out loud. As i said i like a lot of the sentiment behind de mello and tolle et al i just think that the many of the people who preach about this stuff the most are trying to convince themselves as much as anyone else that they are on the right path. The vast majority also find this enlightenment when they are pretty comfortable financially or have very little responsibilities other than looking after themselves.
@RS contradicts the above (afaik from other posts ive read) but im talking in a general sense.
All in all i think some of the stuff is really beneficial (the headspace app is great imo) but on the flip side i think there's also a bit of a pressure to 'get it'. Many people dont want to admit a lot of this stuff sounds like their mate dave does on an acid trip. Are the people who gravitate towards this area (ie the meaning of life or happiness) some of the most unhappy people looking to fill a void that might not be there in other people who live similar lives, seek no reasons, and yet are.....overall....happy?