• © 2000 - 2025 All content on this website is copyrighted and may not be reproduced without consent.
  • TMuscle forum does not sell or endorse any bodybuilding supplements.
    TMuscle has no affiliation with advertisers; they simply purchase advertising space here. If you have questions go to their site and ask them directly.

    Advertisers are responsible for the content in their forums.

    DO NOT SELL ILLEGAL PRODUCTS ON OUR FORUM. IF MEMBERS FIND ANYTHING ILLEGAL PLEASE REPORT IMMEDIATELY FOR PROMPT REMOVAL

    Read Our Forum Terms and Rules

Stan Efferding Vs Mike O Hearn

Tom said:
I will never respect Mike O'Hearn as long as he claims to be natty. There's avoiding the question, then there's lying.
Click to expand...
I don't get why it bothers people. He's making a boatload of cash from saying he's natty. Probably pulling a plethora of stunners and living a great life. Ultimately does it change the fact he's strong as an ox and ripped with a great physique. What anybody says Bout him look at his physique. He isn't bloated or cartooned muscle. Is it beyond the realms of possibility he built this with awesome dream genetics??
 
Mr mac said:
I don't get why it bothers people. He's making a boatload of cash from saying he's natty. Probably pulling a plethora of stunners and living a great life. Ultimately does it change the fact he's strong as an ox and ripped with a great physique. What anybody says Bout him look at his physique. He isn't bloated or cartooned muscle. Is it beyond the realms of possibility he built this with awesome dream genetics??
Click to expand...
you answered your own question, bet you moan when the politicians do the same ie rape the constituents of cash by lying about homes etc...
 
All I know is Mike always looks the same.
He doesnt get bigger or smaller bloated or less bloated.
So for that reason i could believe natural or some very controlled hrt.
He certainly isnt running cycles where his look changes.
 
I believe O'Hearn is natural genetic freak. Listened to a few podcasts of his and he said he has freak strength and size at the age of 14. That ain't gear.
 
"Natural" Mike O'Hearn vs Rich Piana who has excellent genetics when it comes to muscle growth, has admitting using synthol and is honest about steroid use.

Untitled.png

Awesome natty gains in less than 3 years to say he had barely changed in the decade previous.


Let's not forget he also boasts a 600+lbs raw bench and 800lbs squat.
 
hsmann87 said:
I believe O'Hearn is natural genetic freak. Listened to a few podcasts of his and he said he has freak strength and size at the age of 14. That ain't gear.
Click to expand...

A lot of heavily assisted bbers were jacked naturally in their early teens mate.

You can't say 'guys with great genetics are natty and stay natty cos they don't need the gear' lol.

You're a smart bloke anyways...honestly I think you're an idealist when it comes to bodybuilding and you'd LIKE to believe guys like O'Hearn are natty as opposed to actually believing it
 
I believe otherwise... he once claimed to have put on 19lbs in like 3 months due to that there celltech (or somesuch) and tbh he was a lot different looking in the 90s... hes bigger and harder now... stronger too...
 
Wicked video. Always liked Mike. Has a wicked physique and is strong as shit. Something most aspire too but never achieve. I'd say he's pretty intelligent the way he's managed to keep his physique. Got it to the point he wanted and now just keeps it that way.

Can't deny. Handsome knt aswell
 
Efferding would kill him if he could still squat with his competition stance. He's had to narrow his stance severely since his retirement from powerlifting due to hip impingement

Efferding had the better physique when they were both at their best as well

And I seriously doubt that O'Hearn is life time natty. I don't mind either way I'd just prefer he didn't keep harping on about being natty at every available opportunity when 99.9% of people can see its bullshit

^ saying that I've heard a few interviews of O'hearns and he seems like a very nice guy so more power to him, I suppose
 
If he suddenly put his hands up and admitted ped use, there would be another Lance Armstrong scenario, titles and sponsorship money handed back and sued from every angle. He's the American golden boy, (natty,) blond, handsome and muscley. The inspiration to millions who think that his physique is achievable through gym and food. Claiming natty is his livelihood and always has been.
 
CS86 said:
A lot of heavily assisted bbers were jacked naturally in their early teens mate.

You can't say 'guys with great genetics are natty and stay natty cos they don't need the gear' lol.

You're a smart bloke anyways...honestly I think you're an idealist when it comes to bodybuilding and you'd LIKE to believe guys like O'Hearn are natty as opposed to actually believing it
Click to expand...

Nah I just believe that 0.001% of the global population are genetic freaks and just because one of those people don't train in my gym, doesn't mean I'm
Gonna dismiss it and say they're on gear :)

I saw a regular (mildly chubby) office worker woman on the train the other day with the most massive and muscular calves I've ever seen. Fucking freakish. I was actually gonna take a sly pic and post up here but then thought most would just end up speculating that she shoots synthol every day so thought fuck it, would end up a wasted thread lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top